Will You Choose Life or Money?

This election is, for me, one that has to do with one very basic issue. Which is more important, the fact that babies should be entitled to a Constitutionally protected right to life or the fact that one candidate is promising to fix my finances? That is the only choice that I see when I look at this election. Barack Obama has voted several times to take away the basic human right of life from babies that survive partial-birth abortions. How much more viable must a life be than to have survived attempted murder while fresh out of the womb? Yet Senator Obama thinks that these poor children need to die simply because someone paid to have that happen. Isn't that murder for hire? What does the Liberal Left have against babies? The answer is simple. They are pandering to one of their largest constituencies, selfish women who want to pursue their lives however they choose without living up to the responsibilities of being a wife or mother. For these people it is much easier to simply have a child killed so they can get back to their previous lives, which apparently include having unprotected sex whenever and with whomever they please. How can people even begin to think that abortion should be allowed? Check out this YouTube video from Dr. Bernard Nathanson, one of the founders of NARAL.



If this man, who helped set up abortion as a legal practice, by intentionally misleading the courts and our legislators can admit that abortion is an evil practice and must be stopped, why can't these other knuckleheads get it? But here is Obama in his own words stating that he does not want any limits on abortion!




Wake up people! Even Ted Kennedy, Barbara Boxer and Hillary Clinton upheld the Born Alive Act! Yet Obama will continue to support this barbaric practice! It seems that he wants to be Pharaoh! The nurse in this last video says the babies were issued both birth and death certificates. How can anyone be getting away with allowing or causing the death of a baby with a certificate of live birth? If they have been born and that fact has been recognized by the state with a birth certificate, then causing their deaths would be murder and allowing their deaths would be gross negligence, malpractice, child endangering and manslaughter.

Yet there are many people who are about to vote for this man simply because the economy is messed up and they have been personally inconvenienced by this fact. Go on! Vote for your wallet and let the babies die! Sacrifice them for the sake of your lifestyles! You will be just as guilty of their blood as the doctors who are killing them and the politicians who are selling their deaths to garner votes.

It's just that simple a choice, people! You either vote for what is right, which is the defense of living babies, worthy of a birth certificate, or you vote for your wallet which is as dead as a beaver hat. I don't care if you don't believe in God. He believes in you and He is waiting to see which way you will choose!

For more on this subject, check out The Judeo-Christian View

Just a dollar or two to help me keep writing would be appreciated!

Three Political Limericks

Obama says he is for rights
But he also would turn out the lights
On babies who live, past the prerogative
Of the women who spawned the wee mites

Obama just never salutes
Old Glory while the honor guard shoots
Their twenty-one guns, over daughters and sons
Who weighed their last measures in boots

Wall Street has led us to fear
The end of our country is near
While they all parachute, holding all of our loot
Not a one will shed even a tear

If you like these, check out the limerick I submitted for a contest on
Associated Content.

Also you might like the piece written by my friend, Pat, which he titled The Left Is Caught, Finally, Being Their True Selves

Just a dollar or two to help me keep writing would be appreciated!

A Choice To Make

Today, we Ohioans had a choice to make. Actually we had a choice to make before we could vote. We had to choose one of the two major political parties. For people like my wife, who prefers to remain an independent, this is a cruel choice. She had to choose to declare herself as belonging to a party she does not feel aligned with and would never claim in any other situation. What was her only other choice, to stay home, not vote, voluntarily forfeit her franchise?

So, there were no independent candidates. Whose fault is that? When did it become necessary for a candidate to raise a certain amount of money to appear on the ballot? When did this become Constitutional? According to what I learned in school, anyone who meets the Constitutional requirements to serve as president is supposed to be allowed to run for president. The requirements for becoming president are clearly spelled out in the Constitution. There aren't supposed to be any other requirements. The Constitution is supposed to be the supreme law of the land, governing the requirements for all three branches of our government.

Why have we allowed the politicos to corrupt our election process in this way? Can it be that we no longer care how the process works, or is it that we have come to believe the process doesn't work? Did it ever work? I'm doubtful. As much as the founding fathers strove to bring the franchise of the vote to the people, they may have underestimated the apathy of the electorate or the level of mistrust in the process.

Here's an idea! Why don't we all get busy and do our homework and start holding our lawmakers accountable? Why can't we all start paying attention to what our government is doing? Do we really need the media to tell us what to think? Our American media is the epitome of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, endlessly affecting events through the process of "observing" them. How else could a reporter have his foot run over by Britney Spears? Anyone who has ever watched a White House press conference should be able to discern the media's role in affecting our political processes.

Now that we have the internet and numerous ways to find out which lawmakers voted in what directions, who proposed which bills and numerous other metrics pertaining to our Legislative Branch, why don't we simply do our own homework and let the media cover the sensational stuff, which is what they seem to prefer anyway? The reason is simple and it is one I already talked about, apathy! Maybe we forgot that Heisenberg Principle. The way to affect something is to observe it and we the people are the ones who are supposed to be affecting this process. We need to get busy and start affecting it before we have no part in it at all.